Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:39:35 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6.35.10 has been released
Message-ID: <20101219163935.GA23359@kroah.com>
References: <20101214232747.GA18757@basil.fritz.box>
 <877hf66929.fsf@depni.sinp.msu.ru>
 <20101219002146.GA11568@kroah.com>
 <20101219103609.GB28751@basil.fritz.box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101219103609.GB28751@basil.fritz.box>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1084
Lines: 26

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 04:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Could you please update this tree:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git ?
> > 
> > No, the "stable" trees are not being updated anymore, they have moved to
> > the longterm git directory instead.
> 
> It would be good if the old stable git tree for 2.6.35 was deleted to avoid
> confusion. Greg, what do you think?

No, we have never deleted any of the other trees when we "stopped"
maintaining them, so we shouldn't delete these either.

I need to look this week at using git notes to mark trees as unsupported
or supported in a way that will work well.  That should solve this issue
as the note could also say 'go look at the longterm kernel' as well.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/