Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:29:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:29:28 -0400 Received: from pc132.utati.net ([216.143.22.132]:22657 "HELO merlin.webofficenow.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:29:26 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: O(1) scheduler vs 2.4.19-rc1 (question). Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:33:36 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020702210905.687588B4@merlin.webofficenow.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1973 Lines: 43 I'm finally getting around to playing with the O(1) scheduler (well I found a way to break something that this might help), and I'm a bit confused as to what to apply to get the newest version running on 2.4.19-rc1: In http://people.redhat.com/mingo/O(1)-scheduler/ there live a number of files, the most interesting of which for my purposes appear to be: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-O1-2.4.18-pre8-K3.patch http://people.redhat.com/mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-2.4.19-pre10-ac2-A4 http://people.redhat.com/mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-2.4.19-pre10-ac2-B3 Questions: 1) The 2.4.18-pre8 patch is from February 7th. Is that really the latest one for straight 2.4? If nobody's found even a typo in the thing for almost five months, can we expect it in 2.4.20-pre1? 2) Do the -ac patches bring the 2.4-mt O(1) up to the level that's in the -ac tree, or are they against the -ac tree itself? I'd happily run the -ac tree except it doesn't HAVE stable releases, it has "it compiled" releases which do tend to be fairly stable but don't have nice clustering points where enough people are running that particular variant that they can tell you what the inevitable bugs actually are... 3) Is any of the stuff in ingo's directory actually the latest version? I know he wrote it, but I've watched about five other people patch it (Robert Love, etc.), and I didn't keep close track at the time but I'm fairly certain it was more recent than February. 4) What's with the version numbers? I don't THINK the "B3" patch backlevels K3 in a more recent -ac version, especially since "B3" is dated july and "K3" is dated february... I seem to have missed a curve somewhere... 5) Huh? Thanks, Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/