Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S312962AbSGBWIP>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:08:15 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S312973AbSGBWIO>; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:08:14 -0400
Received: from cibs9.sns.it ([192.167.206.29]:26888 "EHLO cibs9.sns.it")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S312962AbSGBWIN>;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:08:13 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 00:10:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: venom@sns.it
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O(1) scheduler for 2.4.19-rc1
In-Reply-To: <1025629895.990.996.camel@sinai>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0207030007040.30706-100000@cibs9.sns.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 768
Lines: 23

On 2 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote:

> Since Ingo recently posted 2.4-ac resyncs, I will refrain.
>
> As I am the one doing these 2.4 patches, I will invariably be asked
> whether I intend for the O(1) scheduler to be merged into 2.4.  The
> answer is a strong NO.
>

Of course, I think you know that you will also asked WHY?

Also if I can immagine your reasons, as similar discussions have been
done for preemption patch and so on, and as I said at the times, I Agree.

2.5 is the place for this new and cool stuff.

Luigi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/