Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754237Ab0LTKgB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 05:36:01 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:42309 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752955Ab0LTKf7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 05:35:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [Bug #20232] kworker consumes ~100% CPU on HP Elitebook 8540w running 2.6.36_rc6-git4 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Ozan Caglayan , 2010-04-22@ogre.sisk.pl, Tejun Heo In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:35:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1292841313.2708.137.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1014 Lines: 21 On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 13:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232 > Subject : kworker consumes ~100% CPU on HP Elitebook 8540w running 2.6.36_rc6-git4 > Submitter : Ozan Caglayan > Date : 2010-10-13 06:13 (68 days old) I'd be thinking that kworker going wonky is something for Tejun to have a look at.. Anyway, is it still relevant for current kernels? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/