Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757510Ab0LTMGN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:06:13 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:2783 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757288Ab0LTMGM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:06:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] scripts: add no-warning option to the checkpatch script From: Joe Perches To: Marco Stornelli Cc: Linux Kernel , apw@canonical.com In-Reply-To: References: <4D0DD027.4000507@gmail.com> <1292813544.22702.342.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1292836937.22702.424.camel@Joe-Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:06:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1292846770.22702.440.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1067 Lines: 23 On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 12:48 +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote: > 2010/12/20 Joe Perches : > > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 09:37 +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote: > >> 2010/12/20 Joe Perches : > >> > Why do you think it's useful? > >> To "debug" a patch from style point of view, I think it's useful to > >> fix before the errors and then the warnings. So this option it's > >> useful as a "filter". However, I added you in cc: because of a reply > >> to my first patch that indicated you as a person interested in this > >> scope. > > Perhaps then it'd be better to filter/enable/disable > > the 3 current categories of messages. > > Maybe something like this: > Yeah, very good. Will it be inserted in mainline? Dunno. Maybe if Andy thinks it worthwhile. He takes his time about this sort of thing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/