Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932995Ab0LTRZH (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:07 -0500 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:40846 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932421Ab0LTRZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4D0F914F.2050908@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:24:31 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap Organization: Oracle Linux Engineering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgSMO8d2U=?= CC: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Stephen Rothwell , Corentin Chary , Matthew Garrett , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Linville Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency References: <1291850970-7190-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de> <201012192000.14969.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <201012201809.41269.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201012201809.41269.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1349 Lines: 38 On 12/20/10 09:09, Peter Hüwe wrote: > Am Montag 20 Dezember 2010, 15:46:02 schrieb Sedat Dilek: >>> Added Stephen Rothwell on CC, maybe he can apply it directly to >>> linux-next ;) >>> >>> Peter >> >> I do not think this will happen for a "as-warning-classified" patch. > > On arm and avr32 it is not only a warning but an error instead! > > -> so the patch fixes an error / build failure which imho is quite an > important issue. > > You can see the errors in Ellerman's build farm. > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3652816/ > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3664077/ > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3652972/ > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3664113/ > > As it is an error for arm and avr32 maybe it should go through their trees > instead? It's a kconfig "error" on x86 also, but it does not stop the .config file from being generated. It needs to be fixed, but it's not deadly. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** desserts: http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/