Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316959AbSGCH2Q>; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 03:28:16 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316960AbSGCH2P>; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 03:28:15 -0400
Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.176.19]:12281 "HELO
	hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S316959AbSGCH2O>; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 03:28:14 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 09:30:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-X-Sender: bunk@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
To: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>
cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4
In-Reply-To: <200207030709.g6379pL378262@pimout2-int.prodigy.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0207030922060.4374-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 831
Lines: 29

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

>...
> The real question is, how much MORE conservative than the distros should the
> mainline kernels be?

Your "the distros" are only a subset of all Linux distributions? E.g. the
2.4 kernel images in Debian (that will be in the next release of Debian)
are plain ftp.kernel.org kernels (no -ac or -aa kernels) with only very
few patches (read: bug fixes) applied.

> Rob

cu
Adrian

-- 

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
time explaining its a free country because its a police state.
								Alan Cox



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/