Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757649Ab0LUHvA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:51:00 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:59564 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753155Ab0LUHu7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:50:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/15] nohz_task: Avoid nohz task cpu as non-idle timer target From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Lai Jiangshan , Andrew Morton , Anton Blanchard , Tim Pepper In-Reply-To: <20101221001354.GG1715@nowhere> References: <1292858662-5650-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1292858662-5650-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1292860078.5021.6.camel@laptop> <20101221001354.GG1715@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:50:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1292917847.5021.180.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1491 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 01:13 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:47:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 16:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Unbound timers are preferably targeted for non idle cpu. If > > > possible though, prioritize idle cpus over nohz task cpus, > > > because the main point of nohz task is to avoid unnecessary > > > timer interrupts. > > > > Oh is it? > > > > I'd very much expect the cpu that arms the timer to get the interrupt. I > > mean, if the task doesn't want to get interrupted by timers, > > _DON'T_USE_TIMERS_ to begin with. > > > > So no, don't much like this at all. > > I suspect TIMER_NOT_PINNED has been introduced to save some power by > avoiding to wake up idle cpus. > > This is used by mod_timer(), schedule_timeout(), mod_timer_pending() > So that's widely used and removing that could have a deep impact on > power. Yeah so? Who said task_nohz had to have the bestest power savings around? Its not a laptop feature by any means. Simply disable the thing: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/timer_migration, or better yet, teach it about your cpuset constraints and avoid it migrating timers into your set and keep timers pinned within the set. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/