Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751717Ab0LUPOk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:14:40 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f66.google.com ([209.85.161.66]:58083 "EHLO mail-fx0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750932Ab0LUPOi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:14:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=GCcFRjupdDKgXl7x5Fldr6P7B5pFjgKuZ2K0lWgTmrOxPmSYvGTs9c8NOu746febS1 ZrAkvgvR/Qa8QHRFYQhWGAkvN5FAJZLSanYSgUh+XT7gbKvSQCw3gKhPRIN6arYprIH7 3iE/junzDmx3hn3yGz/M2P/aw4Jx3WGvQmcD8= Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:14:32 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Lai Jiangshan , Andrew Morton , Anton Blanchard , Tim Pepper Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/15] nohz_task: Stop the tick when the nohz task runs alone Message-ID: <20101221151430.GK1750@nowhere> References: <1292858662-5650-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1292858662-5650-5-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1292860299.5021.8.camel@laptop> <20101220233659.GB1715@nowhere> <1292916958.5021.171.camel@laptop> <20101221132226.GB1750@nowhere> <1292942079.22905.125.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1292942079.22905.125.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1129 Lines: 27 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:34:39AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:22 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:35:58AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > No, and that worries me, you don't even seem to know what the tick does > > > and yet you're working on stopping it. > > > > Yeah, I've been focusing a lot on preemption and rcu because they seemed > > to be the trickiest part of the thing, and I in the meantime I just forgot > > the rest or tagged it too quickly as details to deal with later. And I > > finally forgot them :) > > > > Bah it's a first take, it can only improve ;) > > Exactly! > > This is an RFC, a "release early, release often" approach. And you Cc'd > all the right people. This is not something I expect to make into 2.6.38 > though ;-) No, even before posting I was way from expecting it for .38 ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/