Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752910Ab0LVMXl (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:23:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4041 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752818Ab0LVMXk (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:23:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:16:21 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Tejun Heo Cc: roland@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] ptrace: make SIGCONT notification reliable against ptrace Message-ID: <20101222121621.GA1020@redhat.com> References: <1291654624-6230-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1291654624-6230-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20101220194354.GA23281@redhat.com> <20101221174849.GI13285@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101221174849.GI13285@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 546 Lines: 21 On 12/21, Tejun Heo wrote: > > but do you in general agree with > where it's headed? Absolutely. Except. I am not sure we understand the desired behaviour for CLD_CONTINUED. To the point, perhaps the debugger does not need it at all? Again, I'll try to summarize my questions later today. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/