Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753870Ab0LVQVh (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:21:37 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55739 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753247Ab0LVQVg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:21:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:21:18 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Dan Rosenberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, tgraf@infradead.org, eugeneteo@kernel.org, kees.cook@canonical.com, davem@davemloft.net, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eparis@parisplace.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kptr_restrict for hiding kernel pointers Message-ID: <20101222162118.GC20358@elte.hu> References: <1292708499.10804.89.camel@dan> <20101222130349.GB13412@elte.hu> <1293023589.9820.186.camel@dan> <1293025688.3027.82.camel@edumazet-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1293025688.3027.82.camel@edumazet-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1181 Lines: 32 * Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mercredi 22 d?cembre 2010 ? 08:13 -0500, Dan Rosenberg a ?crit : > > > Hm, why is it off by default? Is there some user-space regression that is caused by > > > this? > > > > > > We really want good security measures to be active by default (and to work by > > > default) - they are not worth much if they are not. > > > > > > > I agree entirely, but I've received a lot of resistance to these types > > of changes in net. I'm afraid that if it's enabled by default, no one > > will actually allow use of the %pK specifier where it should be used. > > > > Actually, "net resistance" was against your first patches, using quick > and dirty techniques (Should I remind you some of them ?) > > Now you have a helper, it should be easier to integrate the changes. Great - if the concept itself wasnt objected to then i think we should flip the default to on. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/