Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753576Ab0LVRSE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:18:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.vsecurity.com ([209.67.252.12]:59166 "EHLO mx1.vsecurity.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752587Ab0LVRSB (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:18:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] kptr_restrict for hiding kernel pointers From: Dan Rosenberg To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tgraf@infradead.org, eugeneteo@kernel.org, kees.cook@canonical.com, davem@davemloft.net, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eparis@parisplace.org In-Reply-To: <20101222171307.GA25611@elte.hu> References: <1293037246.9820.236.camel@dan> <20101222171307.GA25611@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0500 Message-ID: <1293038279.9820.250.camel@dan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 37 On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 18:13 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Dan Rosenberg wrote: > > > + case 'K': > > + /* > > + * %pK cannot be used in IRQ context because its test > > + * for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless. > > + */ > > + if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi()) > > + WARN_ONCE(1, "%%pK used in interrupt context.\n"); > > Hm, that bit looks possibly broken - some useful warning in irq context could print > a pointer into the syslog and this would generate a second warning? That probably > would crash as it recurses back into the printk code? > The double "%%" acts as an escape and simply prints "%" rather than treating it as a format specifier. > Instead a warning could be inserted into the generated output instead, for example > 'pK-error' (carefully staying within pointer length limits). > > Also, it would be nice to see a couple of actual %pK usage sites submitted as well - > instead of this pure infrastructure patch. > I did this separately so that any arguments about individual usage didn't sink the whole ship. Don't worry, you'll get your usage sites very soon. :) -Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/