Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:22:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:22:05 -0400 Received: from [213.4.129.129] ([213.4.129.129]:27975 "EHLO tsmtp7.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:22:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 00:26:36 +0200 From: Diego Calleja To: Ryan Anderson Cc: oliver@neukum.name, trini@kernel.crashing.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OKS] Module removal Message-Id: <20020704002636.59071208.diegocg@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: References: <200207022010.50572.oliver@neukum.name> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 651 Lines: 16 On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Ryan Anderson escribi?: > In a single processor, no preempt kernel, there is no race. > Turn on SMP or preempt and there is one. So we _can't_ talk about remove module removal, but _disabling_ module removal in the worst case. Because if the above is correct, single processors without preempt works well and can use module removal safely... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/