Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:06:27 -0500
From: Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
        Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>, davej@redhat.com,
        cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venki@google.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
        lenb@kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, kent.liu@intel.com,
        chaohong.guo@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        Youquan Song <youquan.song@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: Add sampling window to enhance ondemand
	governor power efficiency
Message-ID: <20101224030627.GA9850@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com>
References: <1293085424-18212-1-git-send-email-youquan.song@intel.com> <20101223110020.GC18363@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101223110020.GC18363@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 660
Lines: 16

> Interesting approach, but seems to be quite different from what "ondemand"
> does at the moment. And, as David Niemi pointed out, it seems to be more
> Intel-specific. Therefore, what do you think about adding this different
> algorithm as a different governor, and keep the "ondemand" algorithm more or
> less as it is?

Good suggestion! I will write a different governor soon if nobody
oppose.

Thanks
-Youquan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/