Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:42:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:42:00 -0400 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:20892 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:41:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 19:44:09 +0200 (MET DST) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Russell King cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Martin Dalecki , Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.24 IDE 97 In-Reply-To: <20020704153313.F11601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1034 Lines: 27 On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 04:18:09PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > I think the best solution (for now) probably would be to supply the mode > > map to the core IDE driver so that it can choose which modes (and > > whether DMA) are available. > > I'm not really following your proposal, so I'll only say that as long as > the chipset driver can tell the core what its capabilities are _after_ > running some chipset specific code, I'll be happy. My tuning scheme satisfies your both demands, by ch->dma_base, ch->autodma and ch->modes_map host informs generic code about its capabilities. > > -- > Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/