Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754133Ab0LaT2A (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:28:00 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:41619 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753166Ab0LaT17 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:27:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N4jypW43Mzkrx6cci/VC0oP0qmrhjp4z5vXlukc01t54PeW/q6esrsGUYC7teVknZO ywfCNFu5xE5FbZ+w8o3ryp/UQL6vnVgy5QprKsZMJIH6yBPFB3Q1jp9y3itfCo50H3y9 1dzGtGO1P6kz7AGvmNO3VSHL5ZOZhzGm3+N10= Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:28:00 +0200 From: Yotam Medini To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible? Message-ID: <20101231212800.1e47f200@janini.home> In-Reply-To: <20101231103345.baba0f8c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20101231193858.2c742025@janini.home> <20101231103345.baba0f8c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Reply-To: yotam.medini@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2694 Lines: 78 Randy, Thanks for your quick reply. Sorry, but the subject line should have been: APM_POWER on x86 - Is it possible? I do get CONFIG_APM=m in the .config, but I am trying to get CONFIG_APM_POWER=m as well. So far, I do not see how. regards -- yotam On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:33:45 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:38:58 +0200 Yotam Medini wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > To an ancient target (my UMAX 530T ActionBook - plz don't laugh...) > > I am trying to build a lean kernel based on 2.6.32.24 (~ Ubuntu 10.04). > > Battery monitoring used to be based on /proc/apm. > > I believe ACPI is not supported on this old notebook. > > Now, it seems that CONFIG_APM_POWER cannot be set, since: > > > > 1. The configuration place for APM_POWER is in: > > ./drivers/power/Kconfig:25: > > config APM_POWER > > tristate "APM emulation for class batteries" > > depends on APM_EMULATION > > > > 2. The configuration place for APM_EMULATION is in: > > ./kernel/power/Kconfig:201: > > config APM_EMULATION > > tristate "Advanced Power Management Emulation" > > depends on PM && SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION > > > > 3. But the configuration places for the latter - > > SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION > > - exists only in: > > ./arch/powerpc/Kconfig:185:config SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION > > ./arch/sh/Kconfig:120:config SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION > > ./arch/mips/Kconfig:896:config SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION > > ./arch/arm/Kconfig:32:config SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION > > and none under arch/x86 ! :(): > > > > So my bottom line questions are: > > + Am I missing something? > > + What is the 'right way' to configure a 2.6.3m.nn kernel > > that should support battery monitoring on such ancient laptops. > > > > When replying, please CC: yotam DOT medini AT Gmail DOT c0m > > regards -- yotam > > -- > > > arch/x86/Kconfig has the kconfig symbol "APM": > > menuconfig APM > tristate "APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS support" > depends on X86_32 && PM_SLEEP > => /proc/apm for battery status information > > so as long as your target system is 32-bit X86, you should be OK. > > PM_SLEEP depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION. PM needs to be enabled, > and SWAP has to be enabled for HIBERNATION. > > --- > ~Randy > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** > desserts: http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/