Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756900Ab1BANvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:51:11 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:47068 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752927Ab1BANvJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:51:09 -0500 Message-Id: <20110201134320.688829863@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.48-1 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:50:55 -0000 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: John Stultz , Richard Cochran , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: [patch 00/28] Rework of the PTP support series core code Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1258 Lines: 35 This is a rework of Richards PTP support series core code. The PTP driver patches are unchanged and not included in this series. The reason for this rework is that I got scared when reviewing: [PATCH V10 09/15] posix clocks: cleanup the CLOCK_DISPTACH macro The patch is really too large and the risk of wreckage too high. So instead of whipping Richard through another round I reworked the series in the following way: 1) Split the CLOCK_DISPATCH cleanup in fine grained steps. That allowed further cleanups and got rid of 200 lines of code and made a lot of functions static. It also fixes subtle changes to the error return codes which happened in the large all in one overhaul (EINVAL vs. ENOTSUP). 2) Move the patches which add new functionality after the cleanup. It does not make sense to add new functionality into the old scheme first and then clean it up. Richard, can you please run that through your testing ? The PTP drivers apply on top of that. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/