Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752128Ab1BAWMo (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:12:44 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:59203 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751470Ab1BAWMn (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:12:43 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc3 regression on parisc: segfaults From: James Bottomley To: Meelis Roos Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:12:40 -0600 Message-ID: <1296598360.18277.11.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 25 On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:00 +0200, Meelis Roos wrote: > I have been testing devel kernels on SMP L1000 successfully until > 2.6.38-rc2-00324-g70d1f36 included. The testing means booting the new > kernel and running aptitude to update to current debian unstable. > > Now I tried 2.6.38-rc3 and got a crash from aptitude on 2 out of 2 > tries. Maybe aptitude was broken inbetween but it looks like a kernel > bug. Retried 2.6.38-rc2-00324-g70d1f36 and that seemed to work fine so > it's more likely a kernel problem. > > What additional information can I provide? Probably a bisection, if you could. There have been no parisc patches between -rc2 and -rc3, so it's coming from outside the architecture. Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/