Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:14:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:14:05 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:1261 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:14:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 02:12:27 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Bill Davidsen , Rob Landley , Tom Rini , "J.A. Magallon" , Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4 Message-ID: <20020705091227.GS22961@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Ingo Molnar , Bill Davidsen , Rob Landley , Tom Rini , "J.A. Magallon" , Linux-Kernel Mailing List References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 768 Lines: 18 On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 08:56:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > are these hard numbers? I havent seen much hard data yet from real-life > servers using the O(1) scheduler. There was lots of feedback from > desktop-class systems that behave better, but servers used to be pretty > good with the previous scheduler as well. I seem to recall some testing having been done demonstrating such differences. I'll ask around when I get back from vacation, though I'll confess it's far afield from my usual interests. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/