Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 06:38:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 06:38:13 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:7352 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 06:38:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:40:37 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: venom@sns.it Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IBM Desktar disk problem? Message-ID: <20020705104037.GM1007@suse.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1142 Lines: 32 On Fri, Jul 05 2002, venom@sns.it wrote: > > HI, > I was trying kernel 2.5 with TCQ enabled. > I tried it on three Desktar disk (manufactured in Thailand > in february 2001) model dtla 305020. > > All three disk died after some week, without > any signal of being dying. > I was starting to suspect about an HW problem. > > With 2.4 kernels, no tcq, they could work > without any problem for almost 8 months, but now, > I moved those disk to test systems to test tcq support > and all died badly. This is not an heat problem, since > thay staty in a CED conditioned at 18C. This is a puzzling report. I wouldn't recommend that anyone use tcq in 2.5 actually, since even I do not know what state it is currently in. I would seriously recommend 2.4 + tcq patches instead. That said, are your disks completely dead now? As in they do not work with a regular 2.4 kernel anymore?! -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/