Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:29:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:29:26 -0500 Received: from pnendick.cpe.dsl.enteract.com ([216.80.39.125]:3845 "EHLO thefunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:29:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:58:23 -0600 From: " Paul C. Nendick " To: Alan Cox Cc: John Cavan , Petr Vandrovec , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.16 SMP: mtrr errors Message-ID: <20001211155822.A1901@thefunk.org> In-Reply-To: <3A3693A8.E0BA83B7@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:23:30PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shall I submit this to Matrox as a bug then? /paul Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) said: > > Petr, the Matrox card splits the memory between the two video screens > > when running in a multi-head configuration and "pretends" that it is two > > distinct cards. Thus, a 32 mb card will register an mtrr for 24mb and > > for 8mb seperately when in this mode. > > That is a driver bug. The intel processors only support MTRR's on certain > power boundaries/sizes. The fall through is intended. > > > to fall through, but is this correct? I've inserted a break at the end > > of the Intel switch before and have not had problems, but I left it out > > Lucky > > > in the latest couple of kernels because of all the mtrr work being done, > > waiting to see if there was resolution. > > The Matrox driver needs to register a single 32Mb MTRR > -- Paul C. Nendick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/