Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755259Ab1BBWHI (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:07:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42632 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755177Ab1BBWHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:07:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:06:49 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe , tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com, shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Message-ID: <20110202220649.GA20538@redhat.com> References: <20110201185225.GT14211@htj.dyndns.org> <1296600373-6906-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com> <20110202215152.GC12559@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110202215152.GC12559@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2362 Lines: 61 On Wed, Feb 02 2011 at 4:51pm -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:46:12PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Skip elevator initialization during request allocation if REQ_SORTED > > is not set in the @rw_flags passed to the request allocator. > > > > Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler. Flush > > requests are not put on IO scheduler so REQ_SORTED is not set for > > them. > > So we are doing all this so that elevator_private and flush data can > share the space through union and we can avoid increasing the size > of struct rq by 1 pointer (4 or 8 bytes depneding on arch)? Correct. > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > > index 72dd23b..f6fcc64 100644 > > --- a/block/blk-core.c > > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > > @@ -1197,6 +1202,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) > > const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio); > > const bool sync = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC); > > const bool unplug = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG); > > + const bool flush = !!(bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)); > > const unsigned long ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK; > > int where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT; > > int rw_flags; > > @@ -1210,7 +1216,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) > > > > spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); > > > > - if (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) { > > + if (flush) { > > where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH; > > goto get_rq; > > } > > @@ -1293,6 +1299,14 @@ get_rq: > > rw_flags |= REQ_SYNC; > > > > /* > > + * Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler. > > + * The request allocator's IO scheduler initialization will be skipped > > + * if REQ_SORTED is not set. > > + */ > > Do you want to mention here that why do we want to avoid IO scheduler > initialization. Specifically mention that set_request() is avoided so > that elevator_private[*] are not initialized and that space can be > used by flush request data. Sure, I'll post a v3 for this patch with that edit and your Acked-by. Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/