Message-ID: <4D4A731E.5030401@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:19:26 +0900
From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ja; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ciju Rajan K <ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2.0]sched: Removing unused fields from /proc/schedstat
References: <4D3F3595.4020607@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D3F3676.1030601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D3FBAD5.1070307@jp.fujitsu.com> <4D463647.7000106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D491BE2.7010802@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D491BE2.7010802@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2585
Lines: 75

Hi Ciju,

(2011/02/02 17:54), Ciju Rajan K wrote:
> Hi Satoru,
>
>
>>> I think we can remove rq->sched_switch and rq->sched_switch
>>> without no problem because they are meaningless. The former
>>> is for old O(1) scheduler and means the number of runqueue
>>> switching among active/expired queue. The latter is for
>>> SD_WAKE_BALANCE flag and its logic is already gone.
>>>
>>> However sbe_* are for SD_BALANCE_EXEC flag and sbf_* are for
>>> SD_BALANCE_FORK flag. Since both logic for them are still alive,
>>> the absence of these accounting is regression in my perspective.
>>> In addition, these fields would be useful for analyzing load
>>> balance behavior.
>>>
>
> The sbe_*&  sbf_* counters were added by the commit
> 68767a0ae428801649d510d9a65bb71feed44dd1 But it was subsequently
> removed by the commit 476d139c218e44e045e4bc6d4cc02b010b343939

OK, I understood. It's OK if user tools referring /proc/schedstat
are released sync with this change.

I confirmed the following:

  - This patch removes some unused schedstat fields and related
    data.
  - The kernel applying this patch works fine on my i386 box.

Tested-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>

Thanks,
Satoru

>
> [ciju@ciju kernel]$ git describe 68767a0ae428801649d510d9a65bb71feed44dd1 --contains
> v2.6.13-rc1~68^2~148
> [ciju@ciju kernel]$ git describe 476d139c218e44e045e4bc6d4cc02b010b343939 --contains
> v2.6.13-rc1~68^2~140
>
> So.. it was introduced and removed in 2.6.13 time frame
>
>
> When the counters were removed the sbe_* sbf_* variable
> declarations were not removed. Hence it caused a little confusion.
> So I believe these stats were not available and hence can't be
> considered as regression.
>
> 476d139c218e44e045e4bc6d4cc02b010b343939 consolidated the fork and
> exec balance. Thereafter it became non-trivial to provide separate
> stats for fork and exec events. So if people think a consolidated
> balance-on-event is needed, it can be looked into separately. But
> that shouldn't prevent this documentation cleanup patch from
> getting in.
>
> -Ciju
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/