Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756523Ab1BCQu5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:50:57 -0500 Received: from 184-106-158-135.static.cloud-ips.com ([184.106.158.135]:41535 "EHLO mail" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753287Ab1BCQu4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:50:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:51:32 +0000 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Gergely Nagy Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , James Morris Subject: Re: CAP_SYSLOG, 2.6.38 and user space Message-ID: <20110203165132.GA28172@mail.hallyn.com> References: <1296733177.14846.26.camel@moria> <20110203153252.GA24153@mail.hallyn.com> <1296748401.14846.39.camel@moria> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1296748401.14846.39.camel@moria> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3367 Lines: 79 Quoting Gergely Nagy (algernon@balabit.hu): > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 15:32 +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Back in november, a patch was merged into the kernel (in commit > > > ce6ada35bdf710d16582cc4869c26722547e6f11), that splits CAP_SYSLOG out of > > > CAP_SYS_ADMIN. > > > > > > Sadly, this has an unwelcomed consequence, that any userspace syslogd > > > that formerly used CAP_SYS_ADMIN will stop working, unless upgraded, or > > > otherwise adapted to the change. > > > > > > However, updating userspace isn't that easy, either, if one wants to > > > support multiple kernels with the same userspace binary: pre-2.6.38, one > > > needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN, but later kernels will need CAP_SYS_ADMIN. It would > > > be trivial to keep both, but that kind of defeats the purpose of > > > CAP_SYSLOG, > > > > The idea would be to only use both when you detect a possibly older > > kernel. > > I was considering that, but... how do I reliably detect an older kernel? > So far, I didn't find a reliable way with which I can detect a kernel > version at run-time (apart from parsing utsname) ... Why not parse utsname? > - but it's entirely > possible, that I missed something obvious. > > Furthermore, this still needs an userspace upgrade aswell, so only helps > one half of the problem. True, that only addresses the less forgivable problem I introduced, namely what does updated userspace even do to do the right thing. > > However, you're right of course, I really should have provided some way > > for userspace to click 'ok, got the message, now continue anyway because > > I'm running older userspace for now,' i.e. a sysctl perhaps. > > > > Sorry about the trouble. Here is a patch to just warn for now, with > > the changelog showing what i intend to push next. > > > > sorry again, > > -serge > > > > From 2d7408541dd3a6e19a4265b028233789be6a40f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Serge Hallyn > > Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:26:15 -0600 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cap_syslog: don't refuse cap_sys_admin for now > > > > At 2.6.39 or 2.6.40, let's add a sysctl which defaults to 0. When > > 0, refuse if cap_sys_admin, if 1, then allow. This will allow > > users to acknowledge (permanently, if they must, using /etc/sysctl.conf) > > that they've seen the syslog message about cap_sys_admin being > > deprecated for syslog. > > Could we have it the other way around, at least for a while? Otherwise, Sure. So long as there is a definite path toward eventually having syslog with CAP_SYS_ADMIN be denied. > if someone happens to upgrade the kernel, and forgets to upgrade the > syslogd, he'll still experience breakage. With defaulting to 1, > compatiblity is kept, and systems that were upgraded properly can set it > to 0 and live happily ever after. The WARNs should prompt people to > upgrade at the first opportunity, so hopefully, it won't go unnoticed > and ignored by userspace. > > I'm not sure one would even see the kernel warn with the syslogd not > being able to read the kernel messages (dmesg, of course, would reveal > it, but that's one extra step). -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/