Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756629Ab1BCRaZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:30:25 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:59383 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756196Ab1BCRaY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:30:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1296699283-6784-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> References: <1296699283-6784-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> From: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:30:02 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RTC regression fixups To: John Stultz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1158 Lines: 29 Hi John, On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 00:14, John Stultz wrote: > ... > Marcelo: Mind giving this full patch set a go? It seems to resolve > the issues in my testing with the rtc-test driver. I have tested the full set in ARM sa1100. Both the sa1100 RTC driver and the rtc-test driver are working fine. The only difference in user space behaviour is, as I have mentioned on a previous message, that the rtc-test driver receives PIE events no matter what, while the previous behaviour was to receive them by echoing through the sys interface. But we must think whether this is something worth keeping or not. You have actually saved me some work fixing the alarm/update broken behaviour on sa1100. Thank you very much. Most of the code in this rtc driver is going to /dev/null, I'll send a patch later. Regards, Marcelo. Tested-by: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/