Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:18:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:18:52 -0400 Received: from molly.vabo.cz ([160.216.153.99]:54023 "EHLO molly.vabo.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:18:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 22:21:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Tomas Konir X-X-Sender: moje@moje.ich.vabo.cz To: Matthias Andree Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IBM Desktar disk problem? In-Reply-To: <20020705201155.GF28569@merlin.emma.line.org> Message-ID: References:

<20020705201155.GF28569@merlin.emma.line.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1172 Lines: 37 On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Matthias Andree wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Tomas Konir wrote: > > > hi i have similar problem. > > No dead disks, but after two days testing tcq patches (on 2.4). I > > got the two ATA errors (smartctl said). > > *shrug* FreeBSD should have eaten some of those drives as well, it has > been offering hw.ata.tags="1" to enable DMA QUEUED for a while now. > > And yes, my deathstar DTLA307045 still works without a single broken > block, but never used TCQ beyond booting 2.5.17 once (no LVM -> not > useful for me). > > Another DTLA307045 died some days ago, it has never seen TCQ. > I have no broken blocks. Only two errors logged in S.M.A.R.T. I have no S.M.A.R.T. errors for one year ago. And after use TCQ there are two errors after two days. Is is normal ? Curently i not believe new IBM disks and TCQ. I'll wait for better disks and stable TCQ. MOJE -- Tomas Konir Brno ICQ 25849167 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/