Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755502Ab1BDKVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 05:21:44 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:60262 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754551Ab1BDKVl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 05:21:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:21:20 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Richard Zhao Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Nicolas Pitre , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Vincent Guittot , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Ben Herrenschmidt , Sascha Hauer , Paul Mundt , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dima Zavin , Saravana Kannan , Ben Dooks , Jeremy Kerr , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare Message-ID: <20110204102120.GJ30452@pengutronix.de> References: <201102011711.31258.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> <20110201105449.GY1147@pengutronix.de> <20110201131512.GH31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110201141837.GA1147@pengutronix.de> <20110201143932.GK31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110201151846.GD1147@pengutronix.de> <20110201152458.GP31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D48741F.8060006@codeaurora.org> <20110201212409.GU31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110204095424.GB2347@richard-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20110204095424.GB2347@richard-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2403 Lines: 58 Hello Richard, On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 05:54:24PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:24:09PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:59:11PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 02/01/2011 07:24 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > I'd also be tempted at this stage to build-in a no-op dummy clock, > > > > that being the NULL clk: > > > > > > > > int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk) > > > > { > > > > int ret = 0; > > > > > > > > if (clk) { > > > > mutex_lock(&clk->mutex); > > > > if (clk->prepared == 0) > > > > ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk); > > > > if (ret == 0) > > > > clk->prepared++; > > > > mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex); > > > > } > > > > > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > I'm afraid this will hide enable/disable imbalances on some targets and > > > then expose them on others. Maybe its not a big problem though since > > > this also elegantly handles the root(s) of the tree. > > > > You can't catch enable/disable imbalances in the prepare code, and you > > can't really catch them in the unprepare code either. > > > > Consider two drivers sharing the same struct clk. When the second driver > > prepares the clock, the enable count could well be non-zero, caused by > > the first driver. Ditto for when the second driver is removed, and it > > calls unprepare - the enable count may well be non-zero. > > > > The only thing you can check is that when the prepare count is zero, > > the enable count is also zero. You can also check in clk_enable() and > > clk_disable() that the prepare count is non-zero. > but how can we check prepare count without mutex lock? Even if prepare count > is atomic_t, it can not guarantee the clock is actually prepared or unprepared. > So it's important for driver writer to maintain the call sequence. I happily point out that the prepare_count needs to be protected by a spinlock and you need a flag that signals a prepare or unprepare is currently running. SCNR Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/