Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752665Ab1BDNKx (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:10:53 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:33244 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752125Ab1BDNKw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:10:52 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19mhktmAZxmlixdRrQVRUl2egVySM+p7poWpE6Gm1 ic6FFELneeGv4Z Subject: Re: 2.6.37 considered stable? From: Mike Galbraith To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <795246.25806.qm@web113301.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <795246.25806.qm@web113301.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:10:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1296825048.8031.32.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 16 On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 04:51 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > Hi Greg, > > just curious and no criticism intended :-) Is 2.6.37 so stable, that it doesn't > need fixes? I mean, it is almost a month out in the wild and no stable release. We're lulling bugs into a false sense of security. We'll slaughter them by the hundreds in their sleep :) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/