Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753177Ab1BDQRK (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:17:10 -0500 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca ([132.246.10.84]:1477 "EHLO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753107Ab1BDQRI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:17:08 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc3 regression on parisc: segfaults To: carlos@systemhalted.org (Carlos O'Donell) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:17:06 -0500 (EST) From: "John David Anglin" Cc: dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, mroos@linux.ee, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Carlos O'Donell" at Feb 4, 2011 10:20:05 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20110204161706.B544B4DF4@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 901 Lines: 20 > > This is possibly the infamous COW bug. > > The COW bug that is triggered by a COW from an LWS-CAS? The solution > to which is to use locks around the LWS-CAS even on UP? I'd forgotten > about this issue actually, I should push that patch out to James. I was actually thinking of the fork/clone race for which there are various testcases on the wiki. The aptitude segv is with a SMP kernel, so I don't think this is the UP LWS_CAS issue. However, I agree you should push the change. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/