Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752391Ab1BDSCV (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:02:21 -0500 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:19138 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752057Ab1BDSCU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:02:20 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6245"; a="73013462" From: David Brown To: Russell King Cc: Daniel Walker , Nicolas Pitre , Greg KH , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, lkml , Stepan Moskovchenko , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree In-Reply-To: <20110204174244.GA7396@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:42:44 +0000") References: <20110131131401.5d6c7646.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <8ya4o8m70jp.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <20110202194359.GC27065@kroah.com> <20110202200030.GA26104@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110202203252.GD28479@kroah.com> <20110202204453.GB26104@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1296839855.4078.12.camel@m0nster> <20110204174244.GA7396@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:dwalker@codeaurora.org::+l+lZYMBv7mT35rP:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000GgA X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:rmk@arm.linux.org.uk::IaJvpxOyt1pueGdz:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Ab0 X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:nico@fluxnic.net::VujCk3/jv1hP42ug:01A4i X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:greg@kroah.com::5gjVtnG5RfpP8FjF:0001iEj X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::AO6TuTdg43j/1Ytg:0000000000000000000000000000000001GOJ X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org::m3vtNQc3+MwxttMY:000000000000000000000000000000001L74 X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:linux-next@vger.kernel.org::tzS9akufEgZiPAux:000000000000000000000000000000000001hH9 X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:sfr@canb.auug.org.au::B6nL+YaLha1i2l+Z:000000000000000000000000000000000000000004HtI X-Hashcash: 1:20:110204:stepanm@codeaurora.org::U31mOmW1nlB+1FE7:0000000000000000000000000000000000000006jFZ Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:02:19 -0800 Message-ID: <8yaei7n1xw4.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 36 On Fri, Feb 04 2011, Russell King wrote: > I really don't care which - but I'll warn you that keeping changes > hidden will result in a reduction of patch quality, and much much > much less testing of those changes. And I won't care at all when you > complain that MSM's broken because of one of my patches. > > Exactly what would you prefer? I'd like to get a little bit of an idea what you would prefer me to do. I see two reasonable workflows: - I make a branch for the files that conflict with other changes in the ARM tree and submit pull requests to you (Russell) for these changes. Other MSM-specific changes would be in another tree that goes to Linus. - I submit everything via pull requests to you. This would probably result in one additional request to you, that contained the stuff that didn't conflict, since it would be nice to resolve the obvious conflicts earlier. The later is more work for you, and less for Linus. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/