Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753012Ab1BDV1l (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:27:41 -0500 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:52354 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752267Ab1BDV1k (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:27:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4D4C6F45.6010204@goop.org> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:27:33 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , Larry Woodman Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync References: <4CB76E8B.2090309@goop.org> <4CC0AB73.8060609@goop.org> <20110203024838.GI5843@random.random> <4D4B1392.5090603@goop.org> <20110204012109.GP5843@random.random> In-Reply-To: <20110204012109.GP5843@random.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3292 Lines: 80 On 02/03/2011 05:21 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:44:02PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> On 02/02/2011 06:48 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Larry (CC'ed) found a problem with the patch in subject. When >>> USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS is not defined (NR_CPUS == 2) it will deadlock in >>> ptep_clear_flush_notify in rmap.c because it's sending IPIs with the >>> page_table_lock already held, and the other CPUs now spins on the >>> page_table_lock with irq disabled, so the IPI never runs. With >>> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y this deadlocks happens even with >>> USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS defined so it become visible but it needs to be >>> fixed regardless (for NR_CPUS == 2). >> What's "it" here? Do you mean vmalloc_sync_all? vmalloc_sync_one? >> What's the callchain? > Larry just answered to that. If something is unclear let me know. I > never reproduced it, but it also can happen without THP enabled, you > just need to set NR_CPUS to 2 during "make menuconfig". > >>> spin_lock_irqsave(pgd_lock) so I guess it's either common code, or >>> it's superfluous and not another Xen special requirement. >> There's no special Xen requirement here. > That was my thought too considering the other archs... > >> mmdrop() can be called from interrupt context, but I don't know if it >> will ever drop the last reference from interrupt, so maybe you can get >> away with it. > Yes the issue is __mmdrop, so it'd be nice to figure if __mmdrop can > also run from irq (or only mmdrop fast path which would be safe even > without _irqsave). > > Is this a Xen only thing? Or is mmdrop called from regular > linux. Considering other archs also _irqsave I assume it's common code > calling mmdrop (otherwise it means they cut-and-pasted a Xen > dependency). This comment doesn't really tell me much. No, I don't think there's any xen-specific code which calls mmdrop (at all, let alone in interrupt context). Erm, but I'm not sure where it does. I had a thinko that "schedule" would be one of those places, but calling that from interrupt context would cause much bigger problems :/ > static void pgd_dtor(pgd_t *pgd) > { > unsigned long flags; /* can be called from interrupt context */ > > if (SHARED_KERNEL_PMD) > return; > > VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt()); > spin_lock(&pgd_lock); > > This comment tells the very __mmdrop can be called from irq context, > not just mmdrop. But I didn't find where yet... Can you tell me? No. I don't think I wrote that comment. It possibly just some ancient lore that could have been correct at one point, or perhaps it never true. >>> @@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ void vmalloc_sync_all(void) >>> if (!ret) >>> break; >>> } >>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); >>> + spin_unlock(&pgd_lock, flags); >> Urp. Did this compile? > Yes it builds (spin_unlock() shouldn't take a "flags" arg.) > I'm not reposting a version that builds for 32bit x86 too until we > figure out the mmdrop thing... Stick it in next and look for explosion reports? J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/