Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:24:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:24:11 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:5394 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:24:10 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:21:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Xinwen - Fu cc: george anzinger , root@chaos.analogic.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel timers vs network card interrupt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 891 Lines: 23 On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Xinwen - Fu wrote: > In fact I want a timer (either in user level or kernel level). > This timer (hope it is a periodic timer) must expire at the interval that > I specify. For example, if I > want that the timer expires at 10ms, it should never be fired at > 10.0000000001ms or > 9.9999999999ms. That is the key part that I want! If you find a way to do picosecond latency on a PC let us know. I (a) don't believe you need any such thing, and (b) think this is a troll. Or is the femtosec? -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/