Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752259Ab1BFLAV (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 06:00:21 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47859 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751984Ab1BFLAT (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 06:00:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:00:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Jeff Chua Cc: Linus Torvalds , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Chris Wilson , Len Brown , LKML Subject: Re: Commit 500f7147cf5bafd139056d521536b10c2bc2e154 breaks _resume_ In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.2 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2581 Lines: 75 At Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:50:51 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> The suspend monster is back! The suspend-to-ram is fine, but upon > >> resume, screen is blank. Haven't bisected in case someone has also > >> done so. > > > > BTW, please don't reply to messages containing patches with reports of problems > > that aren't caused by those patches. It's confusing at best and at worst it > > may result in the patches being rejected. > > Sorry. New subject now:) > > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > >> It's very recent. ... between commit > >> 831d52bc153971b70e64eccfbed2b232394f22f8 and > >> 44f2c5c841da1b1e0864d768197ab1497b5c2cc1. > > > > Hmm. It's almost certainly one of the DRI patches, but which one? I > > think bisection is the only way to figure it out. It shouldn't be too > > bad, since there's only 120 commits in that range. > > > > In fact, you can almost certainly just bisect from 89840966c579 to > > bb5b583b5279, which is just 31 commits and should get you bisected in > > just five tries or so. > > Yea, I've just done that. It came down to the following commit. > Reverting it solves the problem. I've gone thru a few cycles, and > notebook still survives. Hrm, what is the symptom? I couldn't find it because you cut off the thread, and it's not cited. The commit you mentioned just adds an interface, and the the callbacks aren't defined. The real change is either in commit f3269058e7a80083dcdf89698bfcd1a6c6f8fd12 drm/i915/crt: Force the initial probe after reset or commit 5d1d0cc87fc0887921993ea0742932e0c8adeda0 drm/i915: Reset crtc after resume Also the fix might interact with commit 811aaa55ba21ab37407018cfc01770d6b037d3fb drm: Only set DPMS ON when actually configuring a mode thanks, Takashi > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > commit 500f7147cf5bafd139056d521536b10c2bc2e154 > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Mon Jan 24 15:14:41 2011 +0000 > > drm/i915: Reset state after a GPU reset or resume > > Call drm_mode_config_reset() after an invalidation event to restore any > cached state to unknown. > > Tested-by: Takashi Iwai > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/