Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 14:25:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from mail.clsp.jhu.edu ([128.220.34.27]:32997 "EHLO mail.clsp.jhu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 14:25:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 03:14:03 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: James Simmons Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Fbdev development list Subject: Re: More Fbdev policies. Message-ID: <20020706011402.GC112@elf.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 25 Hi! > Recently I was porting several fbdev drivers over to the new api. Some > driver writers asked to have the changes reverted. So anyone who wants the > drivers reverted to the previous state say so. I will revert them. I did > this not to break any drivers but have a smooth transition. This will not > be the case now. > > NOTE: > I will begin change the upper fbdev layer monday thus breaking most > if not all drivers. It is up to the maintainers to fix them. If not > fixed by the end of the developement cycle they will be dropped. End of development cycle == 2.6.0 or 2.6.20? It would probably make sense to only mark them broken for stable series, they are pretty likely to be fixed there. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/