Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752667Ab1BGHwo (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:52:44 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:52587 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752453Ab1BGHwm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:52:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Sq3UjN8Vr3GEpttdbaj2cx0fsbUqcR8xSOkEaF0B30/0z+uyQgQssNTU7wyGLdYfOz V/s3zNQC4hK6ZSU5zrEVUKkHtjrVZ6C7pxjCsUy+wh2QlJjRHeOjDcG/6dNC01kg4AfC a/eOtxjqX0mspEdoH52Ke603wUNGgFNqjqEGI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110206084440.a6c2df3b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <4D4EBAF4.9070403@gmail.com> <20110206084440.a6c2df3b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:52:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: XIP doesn't depend on block From: Marco Stornelli To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux Kernel , Linux FS Devel , Linux Embedded , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1364 Lines: 48 2011/2/6 Randy Dunlap : > On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:15:00 +0100 Marco Stornelli wrote: > >> From: Marco Stornelli >> >> XIP doesn't depend on block symbol, then we can reorder the Kconfig. >> For ext2 doesn't change the Kconfig behavior but if other fs will use >> FS_XIP it won't need to include block support if not needed. > > Hi Marco, > > Do you know of a filesystem where this matters? > Yes, for example mine (pramfs) :) >> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli >> --- >> >> --- Kconfig.orig ? ? ?2011-01-19 00:14:02.000000000 +0100 >> +++ Kconfig ? 2011-02-06 16:04:51.000000000 +0100 > > This filename should include path, like > --- fs/Kconfig.orig > +++ fs/Kconfig > >> @@ -9,13 +9,6 @@ if BLOCK >> ?source "fs/ext2/Kconfig" >> ?source "fs/ext3/Kconfig" >> ?source "fs/ext4/Kconfig" >> - > > The 3 filesystems above are immediately under: > > if BLOCK > > so ext[234] depend on BLOCK. ?Why would it matter about FS_XIP? > I don't know but for example even POSIX ACL was under "if BLOCK", maybe there is only an historical refuse. Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/