Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:53:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:53:13 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:54773 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:53:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:55:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: "Albert D. Cahalan" cc: "J.A. Magallon" , Lista Linux-BProc , Lista Linux-Cluster , Lista Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: Is 'transname' still alive ? In-Reply-To: <200207062036.g66KaMx160715@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 526 Lines: 15 On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > It made the 2.1.44 kernel horribly bad. It used to provide > the POSIX-prohibited ability to do rmdir(".") safely. "Safely" is not the word I'd use for something that allowed to subvert sticky bit on directories, to start with... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/