Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:23:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:23:07 -0400 Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.149]:45365 "EHLO moutvdom00.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:23:07 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 15:25:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Russell King cc: Andreas Schwab , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Witek_Kr=EAcicki?= , Subject: Re: [OT] /proc/cpuinfo output from some arch In-Reply-To: <20020706221205.A5242@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 957 Lines: 32 Hi, On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Russell King wrote: > Processor : Intel StrongARM-110 rev 4 (v4l) > > Note that this could also be something like: > > Processor : ARM/VLSI Arm1020id(wb)BRR rev 1 (v4) > > or: > > Processor : ARM ARM926EJ-Sid(wb)RR rev 2 (v5) I wonder if it's possible w/all those different formats. It's looking completely different on alpha, arm, i386, sparc and s/390x... Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/