Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754962Ab1BGVeB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:34:01 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:54711 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754917Ab1BGVd6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:33:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:33:50 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge cc: LKML , Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] XEN: Interrupt cleanups In-Reply-To: <4D50641B.2090006@goop.org> Message-ID: References: <20110205200108.921707839@linutronix.de> <4D50641B.2090006@goop.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1623 Lines: 44 Jeremy, On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 02/05/2011 12:08 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > the following series converts the interrupt chips of XEN to the new > > chip functions and the last patches replace the xen private resume > > hackery. > > > > The first two patches have no dependencies. > > > > The last two need the modification to the generic interrupt layer. I > > could either carry them through the genirq tree with your > > acked-tested-whatever-by or I provide you a branch to pull that change > > from. I need the genirq change local as it conflicts with other patches > > in the pipeline. Either way works fine. > > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks very much for looking at this. IanC also has some patches to > clean up the Xen interrupt stuff to get rid of the local hacks, so I'll > let him work out how to reconcile the two sets of work (ah, I see he's > already replied). > > [Read patches] > > It doesn't look like there's any functional overlap at all, since his > patches are concerned with using the core irq allocator rather than a > private one, so that's OK. > > Anyway, I'll let Ian do the ack. Ok. The irq_chip conversion is mostly mechanical, but I'm really concerned about that IRQ_SUSPENDED hackery. It'd be nice if you resp. Ian could give that a test ride. That would allow me to cleanup stuff in the core code. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/