Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754740Ab1BHBgM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:36:12 -0500 Received: from SMTP.ANDREW.CMU.EDU ([128.2.11.95]:53879 "EHLO smtp.andrew.cmu.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594Ab1BHBgL (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:36:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:35:42 -0500 From: Ben Blum To: Ben Blum Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, matthltc@us.ibm.com, menage@google.com, oleg@redhat.com, David Rientjes , Miao Xie Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] cgroups: implement moving a threadgroup's threads atomically with cgroup.procs Message-ID: <20110208013542.GC31569@ghc17.ghc.andrew.cmu.edu> References: <20101226120919.GA28529@ghc17.ghc.andrew.cmu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101226120919.GA28529@ghc17.ghc.andrew.cmu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.2.8.11824 X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 8% ( FROM_SAME_AS_TO 0.05, BODY_SIZE_4000_4999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __CD 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FROM_SAME_AS_TO2 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0) X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 8% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4900 Lines: 108 On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:09:19AM -0500, Ben Blum wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:22:26AM -0500, Ben Blum wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:46:04AM -0400, Ben Blum wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:56:49PM -0400, Ben Blum wrote: > > > > This patch series is a revision of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/25/11 . > > > > > > > > This patch series implements a write function for the 'cgroup.procs' > > > > per-cgroup file, which enables atomic movement of multithreaded > > > > applications between cgroups. Writing the thread-ID of any thread in a > > > > threadgroup to a cgroup's procs file causes all threads in the group to > > > > be moved to that cgroup safely with respect to threads forking/exiting. > > > > (Possible usage scenario: If running a multithreaded build system that > > > > sucks up system resources, this lets you restrict it all at once into a > > > > new cgroup to keep it under control.) > > > > > > > > Example: Suppose pid 31337 clones new threads 31338 and 31339. > > > > > > > > # cat /dev/cgroup/tasks > > > > ... > > > > 31337 > > > > 31338 > > > > 31339 > > > > # mkdir /dev/cgroup/foo > > > > # echo 31337 > /dev/cgroup/foo/cgroup.procs > > > > # cat /dev/cgroup/foo/tasks > > > > 31337 > > > > 31338 > > > > 31339 > > > > > > > > A new lock, called threadgroup_fork_lock and living in signal_struct, is > > > > introduced to ensure atomicity when moving threads between cgroups. It's > > > > taken for writing during the operation, and taking for reading in fork() > > > > around the calls to cgroup_fork() and cgroup_post_fork(). > > Well this time everything here is actually safe and correct, as far as > my best efforts and keen eyes can tell. I dropped the per_thread call > from the last series in favour of revising the subsystem callback > interface. It now looks like this: > > ss->can_attach() > - Thread-independent, possibly expensive/sleeping. > > ss->can_attach_task() > - Called per-thread, run with rcu_read so must not sleep. > > ss->pre_attach() > - Thread independent, must be atomic, happens before attach_task. > > ss->attach_task() > - Called per-thread, run with tasklist_lock so must not sleep. > > ss->attach() > - Thread independent, possibly expensive/sleeping, called last. Okay, so. I've revamped the cgroup_attach_proc implementation a bunch and this version should be a lot easier on the eyes (and brains). Issues that are addressed: 1) cgroup_attach_proc now iterates over leader->thread_group once, at the very beginning, and puts each task_struct that we want to move into an array, using get_task_struct to make sure they stick around. - threadgroup_fork_lock ensures no threads not in the array can appear, and allows us to use signal->nr_threads to determine the size of the array when kmallocing it. - This simplifies the rest of the function a bunch, since now we never need to do rcu_read_lock after building the array. All the subsystem callbacks are the same as described just above, but the "can't sleep" restriction is gone, so it's nice and clean. - Checking for a race with de_thread (the manoeuvre I refer to as "double-double-toil-and-trouble-check locking") now needs to be done only once, at the beginning (before building the array). 2) The nodemask allocation problem in cpuset is fixed the same way as before - the masks are shared between the three attach callbacks, so are made as static global variables. 3) The introduction of threadgroup_fork_lock in sched.h (specifically, in signal_struct) requires rwsem.h; the new include appears in the first patch. (An alternate plan would be to make it a struct pointer with an incomplete forward declaration and kmalloc/kfree it during housekeeping, but adding an include seems better than that particular complication.) In light of this, the definitions for threadgroup_fork_{read,write}_{un,}lock are also in sched.h. -- Ben --- Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt | 39 ++- block/blk-cgroup.c | 18 - include/linux/cgroup.h | 10 include/linux/init_task.h | 9 include/linux/sched.h | 37 +++ kernel/cgroup.c | 454 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 26 -- kernel/cpuset.c | 105 +++----- kernel/fork.c | 10 kernel/ns_cgroup.c | 23 - kernel/sched.c | 38 --- mm/memcontrol.c | 18 - security/device_cgroup.c | 3 13 files changed, 575 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/