Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752438Ab1BHJUG (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 04:20:06 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:50600 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253Ab1BHJUE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 04:20:04 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: /proc//sched should contain cumulative data for all threads in process From: Peter Zijlstra To: Chris Friesen Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4D50723B.7020400@genband.com> References: <4D50723B.7020400@genband.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:21:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1297156865.13327.57.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1199 Lines: 27 On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 16:29 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > We've got a tool that gathers lots of scheduling data for each process > (not task/thread) on the system. > > For /proc//{stat,io} this is straightforward, as the per-thread > values are summed together for the process as a whole. > > However, /proc//sched only shows the data for the individual thread > with the same tid as the pid. To get a per-process view we need to > manually scan all the threads and sum them--and this can get expensive > due to all the extra file operations, parsing, etc. > > Was this a concious design decision, or just an oversight? Would a > patch converting it to whole-process values be accepted or is it enough > of a standard interface that we can't break existing apps that expect > the current behaviour? I'd as soon remove all that stuff than extend it, its an abi liability, esp since you're talking about tools parsing this stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/