Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753228Ab1BHKP6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:15:58 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:58644 "EHLO localhost.localdomain" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752873Ab1BHKP5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:15:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:18:40 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Matthew Garrett Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Clarify source code distribution requirements Message-ID: <20110208101840.52ae59f5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1297120144-2142-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> References: <1297120144-2142-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1103 Lines: 25 On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:09:04 -0500 Matthew Garrett wrote: > Some vendors (such as http://users.livejournal.com/joshua_/43185.html) > insist that since section 3(b) of GPLv2 does not contain an explicit > timeframe for source distribution, they can ignore requests for source > for up to 120 days. Clarify the introduction to the license to indicate > that this isn't what's meant. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett 1. You've put it so it as if Linus said it 2. I'd like to see a lawyers take on it first (Linux Foundation perhaps) before it goes in Unless it's been past someone with legal knowledge you risk making the problem worse not better even when doing apparently sane things. You may also be weakening things if the legal view is that there being no timescale means that the two should be going out together. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/