Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755142Ab1BHQ2K (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:28:10 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:64030 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754847Ab1BHQ2I (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:28:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=frVmaqsB/c47KuyghBN+q3Y/xsR563sF4l+R7h7s+8Rf/iyZ11Eg8DAl5AYXrXQD4m JyF/gNXcL++OglQI9usw4PaKzB8rb2WzezKTg4Bh3uXTSaTg/44qYSnZbC5WQS6rx9QC TFuaBxpBWpZorEbDLFTWxkl/Ppab0pHCdTC+U= Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:28:02 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas , Rodolfo Giometti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] POWER: BQ27x00: New Properties, fixes, bq27000 support Message-ID: <20110208162802.GA29842@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <1296953291-10373-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <4D4F4B18.6030502@metafoo.de> <4D516BBB.5090506@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D516BBB.5090506@metafoo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 36 On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:13:47PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 02/08/2011 12:40 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > > That works. However I wonder about the delay, I've experimentally > > determined that bq27500 refreshes in about a second, so before this > > series I could for example run 'watch -n 1 cat current_now' and see > > current changes almost in realtime (when toggling backlight, for > > example). Maybe we could have different cache timeout for different > > chips or have quickly changing properties (like current and voltage) > > bypass the cache. > > Looking at the datasheet confirms that the bq27500 updates the current register > every second. The bq27000 updates it only every 5.12 seconds. > I think reducing the the cache time for bq27500 to 1 second would render the > cache mostly useless, but maybe it makes sense to bypass the cache for voltage > and current on the bq27500. Nope, it's not useless. I.e. for `cat /sys/class/power_supply/*/*`. Actually, it was only the purpose for caching the battery values. So, 1 second is OK. p.s. Lars, on the next resend, can you please remove "POWER:" prefix from the patch description line, bound the commit message width to 76 symbols, and add all the collected Acked-by lines. That way I can just pull your tree. Thanks! -- Anton Vorontsov Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/