Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:39:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:39:45 -0400 Received: from zork.zork.net ([66.92.188.166]:33190 "EHLO zork.zork.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:39:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:42:24 +0100 From: Sean Neakums To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BKL removal Message-ID: <20020707234224.GF20165@zork.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D28CD73.9000601@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Fnord: +++ath X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black X-Message-Flag: Message text advisory: STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE, IGNORATIO ELENCHI Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 827 Lines: 19 commence Thunder from the hill quotation: > We should rename it to something that actually tells you what it does. > BTW, when was lock_kernel()? It must be really old if it still locked the > whole kernel. It was added during the 1.3 development phase. Dave's paper in the OLS proceedings (that was yours, wasn't it?) covers it pretty nicely (at least to my kernel-ignorant eyes). -- / | [|] Sean Neakums | Questions are a burden to others; [|] | answers a prison for oneself. \ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/