Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755197Ab1BIRgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:36:09 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:64414 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754958Ab1BIRgI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:36:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4D52D091.1000504@vflare.org> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:36:17 -0500 From: Nitin Gupta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Magenheimer CC: Minchan Kim , gregkh@suse.de, Chris Mason , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@kernel.dk, riel@redhat.com, Konrad Wilk , mel@csn.ul.ie, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn, tytso@mit.edu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hughd@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] drivers/staging: zcache: host services and PAM services References: <0d1aa13e-be1f-4e21-adf2-f0162c67ede3@default AANLkTimm8o6FnDon=eMTepDaoViU9tjteAYE9kmJhMsx@mail.gmail.com> <5c529b08-cf36-43c7-b368-f3f602faf358@default> In-Reply-To: <5c529b08-cf36-43c7-b368-f3f602faf358@default> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 30 On 02/09/2011 11:39 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > >> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] > >> As I read your comment, I can't find the benefit of zram compared to >> frontswap. > > Well, I am biased, but I agree that frontswap is a better technical > solution than zram. ;-) But "dynamic-ity" is very important to > me and may be less important to others. > I agree that frontswap is better than zram when considering swap as the use case - no bio overhead, dynamic resizing. However, zram being a *generic* block-device has some unique cases too like hosting files on /tmp, various caches under /var or any place where a compressed in-memory block device can help. So, frontswap and zram have overlapping use case of swap but are not the same. Thanks, Nitin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/