Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758042Ab1BKT1k (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:27:40 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:24101 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757377Ab1BKT1k (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:27:40 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,457,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="706768779" Subject: Re: [Patch] idle governor: Avoid lock acquisition to read pm_qos before entering idle From: Tim Chen To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: mark gross , James Bottomley , David Alan Gilbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len , Andi Kleen , Arjan van de Ven , Len Brown , Linux PM mailing list In-Reply-To: <201102112022.25637.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1297300864.2645.128.camel@schen9-DESK> <201102110017.16066.rjw@sisk.pl> <1297385416.2645.262.camel@schen9-DESK> <201102112022.25637.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:27:58 -0800 Message-ID: <1297452478.2645.265.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 619 Lines: 18 On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Thanks, but I'd put that comment before the structure definition with the > "NOTE:" prefix and I think you should explain the reason why that field > shouldn't be changed to 64-bits. > Either you or James want to suggest a comment on why the field shouldn't be changed to 64-bits to be placed there? Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/