Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:00:28 -0800
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] t7166xb: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to
 drivers
Message-ID: <20110214020028.2449dbe4@debxo>
In-Reply-To: <1297675064.2854.12.camel@localhost>
References: <20110211181101.3a4325e4@queued.net>
	<1297675064.2854.12.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 971
Lines: 24

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:17:44 +0200
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 18:11 -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > No need to explicitly set the cell's platform_data/data_size.
> > 
> > Modify clients to use mfd_get_cell helper function instead of
> > accessing platform_data directly.
> 
> Wold it be possible to separate out MTD-related changes?
> 

It's possible, sure.  Patch 09 is the only one that touches
drivers/mtd.  It would introduce build and/or runtime problems if mtd
and mfd trees get out of synch, however.

I was hoping to get subsystem maintainer ACKs and run everything
through the mfd tree, if possible (though I haven't heard any feedback
from Samuel about any of this yet).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/