Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755509Ab1BNOjF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:39:05 -0500 Received: from shutemov.name ([188.40.19.243]:48834 "EHLO shutemov.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753976Ab1BNOjD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:39:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:39:02 +0200 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Paul Menage , Li Zefan , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Helsley , Andrew Morton , linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, v6 1/3] cgroups: export cgroup_iter_{start,next,end} Message-ID: <20110214143902.GA3666@shutemov.name> References: <1297688787-3592-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> <1297688787-3592-2-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 760 Lines: 28 On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:27:44PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Lacks any sensible explanation why and whatfor this needs to be > exported. I thought it's obvious since it's part of the patchset. Am I wrong? > And I really doubt that we want to export that at all. Why? Do you think cgroup_timer_slack built as module is useless? > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_iter_start); > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_iter_next); > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_iter_end); > > Thanks, > > tglx -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/