Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755800Ab1BNRi4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:38:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:56922 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754792Ab1BNRix (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:38:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ioJPYbw1huHxyT950zGOD8LSzxHKuooRgXIiQ+rhJ1MH9zdE0pEHzCG/mvta7HGCfT OgA9Oa62/ApTo0Y+fXIUwXJrKu5w/E7zeWK2d1JlEPWi7xA4cwHSQ5m0VBuK/Lqk7gHf npd5KhuRiWJdCzmX64FJyAp+kkEjIp/AXSp2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1297704447.5226.127.camel@laptop> References: <1297452328.5226.89.camel@laptop> <1297460297.5226.99.camel@laptop> <1297536465.5226.108.camel@laptop> <20110214155113.GA2840@redhat.com> <1297699024.2401.12.camel@twins> <20110214160437.GB2840@redhat.com> <1297700754.5226.110.camel@laptop> <20110214162947.GA3449@redhat.com> <1297701438.5226.113.camel@laptop> <1297702013.23343.51.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1297703892.23343.71.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1297704447.5226.127.camel@laptop> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:38:52 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates From: Will Newton To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt , Jason Baron , Mathieu Desnoyers , hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org, roland@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, sam@ravnborg.org, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, michael@ellerman.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger , Chris Metcalf , dhowells , Martin Schwidefsky , "heiko.carstens" , benh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 19 On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> So all but a few have basically (as you said on IRC) >> #define atomic_read(v) ACCESS_ONCE(v) > > ACCESS_ONCE(v->counter), but yeah :-) I maintain an out-of-tree architecture where that isn't the case unfortunately [1]. Not expecting any special favours for being out-of-tree of course, but just thought I would add that data point. [1] Our atomic operations go around the cache rather than through it, so the value of an atomic cannot be read with a normal load instruction. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/