Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751358Ab1BNS10 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:27:26 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:51615 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022Ab1BNS1X (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:27:23 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=II/AZRSboKQ7DzD5uVC0KNPXPb7l3QZUvFXbuuMdhOVjQZCghBZAYn1irFtt4HUSxw SHhlMkGkChaf8SF9kyv4r+mhLmuSZHPeGrwtyHOCN6XrgGh8NQUgSw+zPxxIrDplXAX/ j5Isa0fPQ2JZpA7tQi6X16ctvqxeSpTCCedPo= Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:27:18 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Yinghai Lu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Message-ID: <20110214182718.GB18742@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1297530663-26234-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1297530663-26234-16-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <4D5729A7.7070706@kernel.org> <20110214113221.GG18742@htj.dyndns.org> <20110214161249.GV18742@htj.dyndns.org> <20110214162247.GX18742@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1124 Lines: 28 Hello, On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:14:15AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > I just want seperate setup_bootmem ( and maybe init_memory_mapping_high...) > out that __register__ function. > > that __register__ function do some sth like memblock_register to > early_node_map[] looks reasonable. Can you please provide some rationales _why_ you think setup_bootmem() should be moved elsewhere? Because it is not apparent to me and I cannot read your mind. I'm not against it given good enough reasons. After all, _technically_ it doesn't make one iota of difference, but I don't want to change it just because you don't like it and I don't think you want that either, so _please_ give me some explanations about what you want and _why_. It's not like we're involved in a romantic relationship and even when I'm in one I suck at that implied communication thing. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/