Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751981Ab1BNSqs (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:46:48 -0500 Received: from xes-mad.com ([216.165.139.218]:12152 "EHLO xes-mad.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751865Ab1BNSqq (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:46:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: Add ability to get GPIO pin direction From: Peter Tyser To: Grant Likely Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alek Du , Samuel Ortiz , David Brownell , Eric Miao , Uwe Kleine-K?nig , Mark Brown , Joe Perches In-Reply-To: References: <1294343654-20354-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com> <1297698493.965.5475.camel@petert> <20110214170812.6f54a4bb@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1297705520.965.5657.camel@petert> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:46:03 -0600 Message-ID: <1297709163.965.5858.camel@petert> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2373 Lines: 48 On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:04 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > >> > We need four states for a gpio pin direction though. A pin can be > >> > > >> > - input > >> > - output > >> > >> There are actually multiple output modes that a specific gpio > >> controller could implement, but the gpio api only has a boolean > >> understanding of output. I don't know if it is really worthwhile to > >> try and encode all the possible configurations in this API. > >> > >> > - unknown (hardware lacks get functionality and it has not been set by > >> > software yet) > > > > I'm not sure how we could handle unknown directions in a better way. We > > really should know the direction by this point for most (all?) GPIO > > chips. I'd think the proper fix would be to make sure we can detect a > > direction for all chips - either by reading hardware bits or by having > > the platform code let us know (eg pdata->n_latch in pcf857x.c). If you > > have a suggestion about how unknown pins should be used, I can look into > > it and submit a follow up patch. > > Does it really matter? Sure it's *nice* to have the current status > information if the driver can easily get it, but it probably isn't > critical. Any user of the pin should be putting the pin in the mode > it needs regardless of the initial state. I don't think it matters too much since I haven't encountered a driver where you can't determine a pin direction yet. But if it were impossible to determine a direction, it would throw people off. They'd have to know that the pin direction couldn't be trusted initially, which is a big leap (this is the bug I'm trying to fix with this patch). Eg if someone sees a pin direction as "input" via sysfs, what are the odds that they'll run "echo input > direction" just to make sure... Anyway, I don't think its a critical issue either since its a corner case with an easy workaround. If we did want to add support for allowing a direction of "unknown", it could be in a follow up patch since its technically a bigger issue than this patch. Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/